Monday, April 20, 2026

Top 5 This Week

Related Posts

The Salvar El Cotillo platform deems the Dreamland project an “aberration.”

The Controversy Surrounding Dreamland: A Threat to Nature and Local Communities

The citizen platform Salvar El Cotillo has expressed intense opposition to the proposed location of the “cinematic city” Dreamland, deeming it an “aberration” to the territory. This ambitious project is planned to be situated approximately 400 meters from the Parque Natural de las Dunas de Corralejo, a site of vital ecological significance.

Background of Salvar El Cotillo

Emerging initially to prevent the construction of a private camping site in the Special Protection Area for Birds (ZEPA) at Piedra Playa, Salvar El Cotillo has broadened its focus to address other projects perceived as harmful to the environment. Their central argument revolves around the protection of natural landscapes that boast high ecological value.

Dreamland: Vision or Environmental Catastrophe?

The Dreamland project, championed by empresario José Antonio Newport, who also holds the position of Vice President for Fuerteventura in the Confederación Canaria de Empresarios, aims to occupy 160,001 square meters of rustic land. The proposed attractions include film production facilities, a virtual reality park, warehouses, an amphitheater, commercial areas, and restaurants.

Despite acknowledging the island’s need for economic diversification beyond tourism, Salvar El Cotillo warns against relying solely on “megaprojects” that lack real demand. They challenge Newport’s assertions suggesting a significant need for such facilities, arguing instead for a more sustainable approach that preserves the area’s unique ecological landscape.

The Speed of Approval Raises Eyebrows

One of the platform’s chief concerns lies in the rapidity with which the project has advanced. In a mere two weeks, regulatory bodies have provided the necessary reports and informed the La Oliva Town Hall’s Board of Government. This speed, they argue, raises questions about the scrutiny and consideration afforded to projects that could impact fragile ecosystems.

Alternative Locations for Economic Growth

The platform vehemently opposes Dreamland’s chosen location, asserting that the ecological and landscape implications are severe. Instead, they propose utilizing existing urbanized or semi-urbanized spaces that currently lie vacant. Salvar El Cotillo advocates for a balanced model of economic growth that respects the natural environment—one that enhances both community welfare and visitor experience.

A Call for Sustainable Development

With the natural beauty of the island being one of its most significant assets, it is imperative for decision-makers to develop strategies that don’t compromise this allure. Rather than supporting projects that could lead to habitat destruction, the community urges leaders to consider alternatives that sustain and celebrate their unique geography and wildlife.

Impacts on Local Flora and Fauna

Critics of the Dreamland project also highlight its potential adverse effects on local wildlife, particularly the Hubara Bustard, a vulnerable species dependent on ecological corridors to thrive. The proposed mega-cinematic development is feared to encroach on these habitats, further threatening the survival of such species.

Engaging the Community

In a bid to rally support against the proposed project, Salvar El Cotillo is encouraging citizens to attend the upcoming Cabildo plenary meeting scheduled for Friday at the Palacio de Congresos de Puerto del Rosario. This meeting will discuss the declaration of urban interest related to Dreamland. Community involvement, they argue, is crucial as this issue directly affects everyone.


By addressing these interconnected themes, this article captures the essence of the ongoing debate surrounding the Dreamland project and highlights the community’s dedication to protecting their environment and heritage.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Popular Articles