Fuerteventura Times – Business & Startups
Innovation and sustainability drive job growth in Fuerteventura’s economy.
As Fuerteventura continues to evolve, its economic landscape is increasingly shaped by businesses embracing innovation and sustainable practices. The island, known for its breathtaking beaches and vibrant tourism, is witnessing an upsurge in startups dedicated to environmentally friendly solutions. This shift not only solidifies Fuerteventura’s position as a leader in sustainable development but also creates numerous job opportunities, particularly for the younger demographic eager to engage with green technologies.
Local entrepreneurs are capitalizing on Fuerteventura’s natural resources, developing ventures that range from renewable energy systems to eco-conscious tourism. Initiatives focusing on wind and solar power are not just reducing the island’s carbon footprint; they are also providing a blueprint for economic independence and resilience in the face of climate change. Additionally, the growth of the ecotourism sector has prompted traditional businesses to adapt, ensuring they remain competitive and relevant in this changing landscape.
Investing in education and vocational training for the local workforce is crucial for sustaining this momentum. Partnerships between government agencies, educational institutions, and private enterprises are emerging to provide the necessary skills that young professionals need to thrive in these innovative sectors. As Fuerteventura leans into its future, it sets a transformative example for islands worldwide, blending natural beauty with robust economic prospects.
Source: Gobierno de Canarias
The Superior Court of Justice of the Canary Islands has revoked the conviction for fraud imposed in the first instance on a real estate mediator who operated in Fuerteventura and has agreed to her acquittal, understanding that the “fair amount of deceit” typical of the crime has not been proven with the required solidity. The appealed sentence, handed down by the Court of Las Palmas on October 13, 2025, imposed one year in prison and the payment of 15,000 euros in compensation to the buyers. The events date back to the spring of 2016. According to the resolution, on April 22, 2016, some of the investigated clients made a transfer of 14,000 euros to reserve an apartment in Fuerteventura and, on May 24, 2016, they made three other transfers for 11,000 euros, 1,275 euros and 15,000 euros, the latter under the concept of “renovation.” apartment.” On May 27, 2016, a private lease contract with an option to purchase was signed for the home, which was later not made public due to the property’s classification as VPO, a circumstance that the Criminal Chamber of the TSJC includes as part of the context of the conflict. The Court had considered it proven that the accused acted “taking advantage of the buyers’ lack of knowledge of the language” and that she made them believe that the operation would have no intermediation cost, when in reality she would have charged an “absolutely disproportionate” commission of 15,000 euros. The TSJ, however, concludes that this version is not proven with the necessary firmness and that the sentencing reasoning presents weaknesses.” The Chamber affirms that the issue could raise doubts about the final destination of the money and the correctness of the intermediation, but that this is not enough to criminally affirm a fraud, because “the typical facts of the crime of fraud do not occur.” The resolution adds that the fact that the 15,000 euros were deposited into the real estate company’s account “is “irrelevant” by itself to exclude or affirm the profit motive, and remembers that the activity of the real estate mediator is “typically onerous.” In this context, the ruling points out, the doctrine of the so-called “duty of self-protection or self-protection of the victim” in the crime of fraud becomes relevant. Criminal jurisprudence, the court recalls, outlines this duty as an auxiliary criterion to assess the sufficiency of deception: the average person who acts with ordinary diligence is protected, “but the criminal coverage to cases in which the victim’s own behavior, due to his passivity or lack of minimal verification, contributes decisively to the production of damage,” he emphasizes. Although the most recent jurisprudence limits an extensive interpretation of the duty of self-protection, remembering that the deception does not have to be neutralized by the diligent activity of the victim, it is true, emphasizes the TSJC, that in this case “the purchasers-complainants (who, by the way, have been legitimately occupying the house that they were going to buy for almost ten years and who refused to accept a more than reasonable agreement to resolve the conflict) could not ignore the destination of the 15,000 euros, given the substantial equivalence of the expressions in Spanish and Italian. “The court completely revokes the lower court ruling, acquits the accused and declares ex officio the costs of the appeal.
Originally reported by elburgado.com, rewritten by the Fuerteventura Times AI Editorial Desk.
